Předmět Rural Development - EMN (EHEA3E)

Na serveru studentino.cz naleznete nejrůznější studijní materiály: zápisky z přednášek nebo cvičení, vzorové testy, seminární práce, domácí úkoly a další z předmětu EHEA3E - Rural Development - EMN, Provozně ekonomická fakulta, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze (ČZU).

Materiál	Typ	Datum	Počet stažení

Cíl

The objective of the course unit is to educate the experts for rural development. They should be skilled to apply theoretical knowledge provided by social sciences (mostly economics and sociology) in concrete strategies and projects of rural development in order to make this development sustainable (economically profitable, environmentally friendly and socially acceptable).

Osnova

PřednáškaSocial sciences and their role in rural developmentThe countryside as the space (the ways of defining countryside; classifications and types of rural areas, LFA)The countryside and timeConcepts of rural-urban relations and their projections into practical issues of rural developmentThe issues of social and cultural in rural development (social capital, human capital, cultural capital, intellectual capital, civic engagement and participation)Economic background of rural development (projection of economic theories into rural development)Sociological background of rural development (projection of sociological theories into rural development)Rural development as process moderating rural-urban inequalitiesRural development (sustainable rural development as modernization and maintenance of the countryside)Exogenous model of rural developmentModel of integrated endogenous rural developmentRural development and globalization (globalization and its impacts on rural communities)CvičeníRural development as the activity and field of study of rural studiesImagination and its role in rural development(presentations of the students)Promoting sensitivity to social and cultural in rural development (food as social and cultural phenomenon)Logical frame planning matrix (LOGFRAME) as the tool for rural development project management and implementation - its elaborationWorking with LOGFRAME on situations demonstrated by videoPresenting group rural development projects

Získané způsobilosti

Znalosti:The students master the knowledge of various theoretical backgrounds of rural development (especially those originating in economics, sociology and social geography). Their knowledge is of interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary nature and links the knowledge of contemporary dominating theories in the economics, sociology and social geography with the practice of rural development. Knowing the differences between endogenous and exogenous models of development the students know which one suits to the certain contexts of the development which are clearly delineated by the students based on their knowledge of the appropriate theories. The students use their knowledge to implement the research which is necessary element of the passing the course unit in relation to the elaboration of the development project. The students are expected to govern innovative and non-trivial knowledge and to be sensitive to social aspects of the live which might be projected into practical skills. Their knowledge is both of practical nature (the skills and knowledge how to elaborated development projects) and of theoretical nature (to implement the research linked to the rural development).Dovednosti:The students are skilled to formulate non-trivial ways of solving the problems. It means they are able to address various problems in the countryside in the sensitive way (backed through the concept of the sustainability) and therefore implemented solutions have their value added (innovative and sustainable solutions). Based on the literature they studied and using the data available they are able to argue for their suggestions dealing with various situations emerging in the countryside which were not addressed in the lectures and consultations. They master to apply the principles of the sustainability in the rural development - i.e. they know how to link economic profitability with social sensibility and acceptability and with environmental friendliness.Kompetence - komunikace:The students speak fluently in English and they communicate in English without any problem. They are skilled to work in the international teams where English is required. They know how to present the findings, projects and their views the public which is not initiated into the rural development in details. They are able to explain various theoretical backgrounds and practical measures linked to them.Kompetence - úsudek:Students know to find out and to argue about the problems. They are able to analyze the context of the problem and to link it with various aspects of the life in the countryside. Their opinions are more complex and socially sensitive; they consider various impacts of development activities. Their opinions are systematic and complex and they are based on the available theories and concepts of the social sciences

Literatura

ZákladníButtel, F.H. 2001. Some Reflections on Late Twentieth Century Agrarian Political Economy. Sociologia Ruralis 41 (2)165-181Douwe van der Ploeg, J., Renting, H. Minderhound-Jones, M (eds.). 2000. The Socio-Economic Impact of Rural Development Realities and Potentials. Sociologia Ruralis 40 (4) 391-543Falk, I. Kilpatrick, S. What is Social Capital? A Study of Interaction in a Rural Community. Sociologia Ruralis 40 (1) 87-110.Innovations, Institutions and Rural Change (ed. by M. Blanc). 2003. Luxembourg Office for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesLowe, P. 2000. The Challenges for Rural development in Europe. Pp. 19-31 in Conference Proceedings (5th European Conference on Higher Agricultural Education) "From Production AgriRural Development in Europe the EU LEADER Programme Reconsidered (papers edited and introduced by Christopher Ray) 2000. Sociologia Ruralis 40 (2) 163-227.DoporučenáBauman, Z. 1999. Globalizace (Důsledky pro člověka). Praha Mladá fronta.Blažek, B. 1998. Venkov, město média. Praha Sociologické nakladatelství.Blažek, J. Uhlíř, D. 2002. Teorie regionálního rozvoje (nástin, kritika, klasifikace). Praha KarolinumHompland, A. Rurbanizace, předměstí a metropole. Sociální scénáře v Norsku a Evropě. Zemědělská ekonomika 40 (5) 397-408.Hudečková, H, 1995. Privatizace v zemědělství a obnova venkova. Sociologický časopis 31 (4)449-462.Hudečková, H., Lošťák, M. 2002. Sociologie a její aplikace v regionálním/rurálním rozvoji. Praha PEF ČZU.Illner, M. 1992. Continuity and Discontinuity. Political Change in Czech Village After 1989. Czechoslovak Sociological Review, Special issue, August 199279-91.Kayser, B. 1990. La renaissance rurale (Sociologie des campagnes du monde occidental). Paris Armand Colin.Jehle, R. 1998. Pojetí endogenního rurálního rozvoje a jeho zavádění do regionální politiky v České republice. Zemědělská ekonomika 44(1) 9-17.Johaentges, A. 1996. Das Dorf als Wohnstandort. Bonn Forschungsgesellschaft für Agrarpolitik und Agrarsoziologie e.V., Bonn.Librová, H. 1996. Decentralizace osídlení - vize a realita. Část první vize, postoje k venkovu a potenciální migrace v ČR. Sociologický časopis 32 (3)285-296.Librová, H. 1997. Decentralizace osídlení - vize a realita. Část druhá decentralizace v realitě České republiky. Sociologický časopis 33 (1)27-40.Lošťák, M. 1999. Projekty rozvoje venkova a jejich realizace. Zemědělská ekonomika 45(2) 85-91.Newby, H. 1982. Rural Sociology and Its Relevance to the Agricultural Economist A Review. Journal of Agricultural Economics 33 (2) 125-165.

Požadavky

General Economics, Methods of Social Reserach

Garant

doc. Mgr. Helena Hudečková, CSc.