Předmět Evaluation in APA (KAT / @EVAL)

Na serveru studentino.cz naleznete nejrůznější studijní materiály: zápisky z přednášek nebo cvičení, vzorové testy, seminární práce, domácí úkoly a další z předmětu KAT / @EVAL - Evaluation in APA, Fakulta tělesné kultury, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci (UP).

Materiál	Typ	Datum	Počet stažení

Obsah

1. IntroductionRequired reading: Buy or borrow from library required course text.Recommended reading: You can start reading ahead.2. Framework of evaluation in APA.Required reading: Horvaht, M. Block, M.E.,Kelly, L.E. (2007). Why you are assessing (pp. 9-22)Recommended reading: Sherrill, C. (2004). APA, Recreation and sport (6th ed). Madison, WI: McGraw-Hill. Chapter on the Individual Education Program and evaluation.3. Selection of appropriate assessmentRequired reading: Horvaht, M. Block, M.E.,Kelly, L.E. (2007). Selecting an Appropriate Instrument (pp. 37-50)Recommended reading: Block, M.E:., LIebermans, L.J., & Connor-Kun¨tz, F. (1998)- Authentic assessment in APA. JOPERD, 69(3), 48-56.4. Appropriate assessmentRequired reading: Horvaht, M. Block, M.E.,Kelly, L.E. (2007). Selecting and Administering Tests (pp. 51-74)Recommended reading: Sherrill, C. (2004). APA, Recreation and sport (6th ed). Madison, WI: McGraw-Hill. Chapter on the Individual Education Program and evaluation.5. Evaluation of motor behavior of persons with disabilities.Paper due (10pts): Short paper where you will answer following question: Why to assess children with special needs in APA? (length of paper 1page, single line spacing, font ARIEL 10p). You need to use at least 4 resources (including books, articles, internet) which you need properly reference.Required reading: Horvaht, M. Block, M.E.,Kelly, L.E. (2007). Assessing Motor Developemnt and Motor Skill Performace (pp. 75-106)Recommended reading: Ulrich, D.A. (2000). Test of Gross Motor Development (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.6. Evaluation of physical fitness of persons with disabilities.Required reading: Horvaht, M. Block, M.E.,Kelly, L.E. (2007). Assessing physical fitnesss (pp. 107-136)Recommended reading: Winnick, J.P., Short, F.X: (1999). Brockport Physical Fitness Test. Champaign, IL. Human Kinetics.7. Process of IEP preparation for persons with disabilities.Required reading: Horvaht, M. Block, M.E.,Kelly, L.E. (2007). TRansůlating Assessment into Action: Team Approach (pp. 189-206)Recommended reading: Block. M.E. (20077). A teachers guide to including students with disabilities in general physical education (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.8. Analysis of behaviors of students and teachers in PE.Required reading: Horvaht, M. Block, M.E.,Kelly, L.E. (2007). Assessing Behavior and Social Competence (pp. 157-188).Recommended reading: Academic learning time in PE (Article by Vogler and Block, will be copied by teacher upon request).9. Analysis of attitudes toward inclusion in PEPaper due (30pts): Long paper where you will answer following question: Why, Where and What to assess? You should cover models and principles of evaluation, state and role of evaluation in my country (length of paper 5 pages, single line spacing, font ARIEL 10p). You need to use at least 10 resources (including books, articles, internet) which you need properly reference.Required reading: Kudláček, M., French, R., Myers, B., Sherrill, C., & Válková, H. (2002). An inclusion instrument based on planned behavior theory for prospective physical educators. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19(3), 280-299.Recommended reading: Sherrill, C. (2004). APA, Recreation and sport (6th ed). Madison, WI: McGraw-Hill. Chapter on attitudes and social acceptance (pp.240-260).10. Presentation of thesis proposal with accent on evaluation (method section)You are to present 8-10 minutes presentation of MSc. Thesis proposal with the use of power point.11. Ethics related to gathering and handling of data and information.TEST: This date there will be test evaluation all coursework.Recommended reading: Publication Manual of American Psychological Assiciation.

Získané způsobilosti

Following successful completion of the course you will be able to:1. Present and promote PAPTECA model.2. Identify different approaches to assessment (evaluation) in the context of APA.3. Summarize the value of evaluation in APA.4. Choose and apply appropriate evaluation tools.

Literatura

See the required and recommended reading in particular issues of the Content.

Požadavky

PASS-FAIL (zápočet)1. Evaluation of assigned papers - 40 %2. Evaluation of oral presentation of thesis proposal - 30 %3. Evaluation of written tests - 10 %4. Active course participation - 20 %Course Textbook (required)Horvath, M., Block, M.E:, & Kelly, L.E. (2007). Developmental and Adapted Physical Activity Assessment. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL. Malpractice and PlagiarismMalpractice is an attempt to gain an advantage over other students by the use of unfair or unacceptable methods. It has three common forms:1. Cheating in Examinations. The introduction into the exam room of unauthorised material (written, printed or electronic), copying from another student, impersonating another student, removing answers from the exam room.2. Plagiarism. The passing off of someone else's work (thoughts, writings, results) as your own. It commonly occurs where a student fails to acknowledge the use of material from a book article, or from the internet. It also occurs when a student appropriates the work of another student.3. Fabrication of Results. A deceitful claim to have carried out experiments, tests, interviews, observations etc as part of assessed work; or the presentation of fabricated results. To avoid accusations of plagiarism always:1. cite the source of your information (including websites);2. reference your work accurately and appropriately;3. include details of your referenced texts in the bibliography.For more information on referencing correctly read (APA Manual)When a student is suspected of malpractice, an independent Investigating Committee of senior members of the College is set up to consider and adjudicate on the matter and to advise the Board of Examiners as appropriate. A range of penalties may be recommended depending on the seriousness of the offence from a lowered mark for a particular module or disqualification for assessment of the piece of work produced which may affect the overall degree classification, through to a withholding of the award (i.e. a FAIL result).

Garant

doc. Mgr. Martin Kudláček, Ph.D.

Vyučující

doc. Mgr. Martin Kudláček, Ph.D.